Thursday 11 February 2016

Odds & Ends - 1

As with my other post today, the subject of this mini-post was brought to my attention by H. We're all probably familiar with reaction videos on YouTube. Random individuals post videos of themselves reacting to films, games, music videos and anything under the sun really.

These can get popular, and often a lot of these individuals amass subscribers in the hundreds of thousands. I don't need to mention that these individuals stand to earn mucho plata if they monetize their videos.

H, who's a pop-culture maven, told me that recently she's been coming across videos of white people reacting to Indian movies/trailers. That got us thinking. Of course, there are individuals the world over who are genuinely interested in world cinema, and take an effort in sincerely exploring the art forms of other cultures. However, a lot of these reaction videos could also be made by individuals who've figured out that they stand to make a killing by catering to an Indian audience.

As mentioned in a previous post, a lot of Indians crave the white seal of approval, combine this with the fact that we have the fastest growing internet subscriber base, it all adds up to the perfect recipe for random white dudes to make a fortune by producing these reaction videos.

Something to think about.

Wednesday 10 February 2016

Pizza: A review




Garcon, this is not what I ordered.
 After all the running around last week, and viewing a slew of foreign films at the Biffes, I decided to settle down with something homegrown. I picked a film that I had somehow missed on its cinematic release, “Pizza”. This thriller/horror, was a huge indie hit in 2012. It was the film that established director Karthik Subbaraj, and actor (and current indie superstar) Vijay Sethupathi, as artists to watch out for.

I’d watched Karthik’s brilliant “Jigarthanda” on its release, and loved it. That was a quintessential Tamil gangster film that also wore its influences on its sleeve. What I really admired about it was that when the current crop of Tamil and other Indian language films are trying and failing miserable to ape Hollywood crime flicks - with globetrotting dons and imbecilic storylines - “Jigarthanda” went back to the roots, and was a stylish gangster film rooted in Tamil (and Indian-ness), without insulting the audience’s intelligence.

As mentioned earlier, I’d missed out on watching “Pizza” due to combination of various factors. In the meantime, the film had been hyped up tremendously by the media, friends, acquaintances etc. This combined with the fact that I really liked “Jigarthanda” and wanted to watch Karthik’s earlier output, made me jump at the opportunity to watch “Pizza” when it presented itself. 

I started watching the film alone, at around 11 in the night, in a darkened room. The perfect setting. I must hand it to Karthik, parts of the film were genuinely unnerving, there is a large portion of the film that takes place inside a bungalow, with just Vijay Sethupathi (I’m a sucker for films – or atleast large extended portions of it – which are one-man shows, set in confined locations). In such cases, it’s hard to hold the audience’s interest and move the story forward. However, the “Pizza” team have pulled it off.

Michael (played by Vijay) is a pizza delivery guy at a restaurant. He is in a live-in relationship with his girlfriend, Anu, who’s a horror buff. She’s a huge fan of horror films, books, shows and even claims to have had a paranormal experience herself. This is in direct contrast to Michael, who is not really sure if he believes in these things, and is also a bit faint of heart. As the story progresses we learn that they are orphans and have known each other since school. We also learn that Anu is pregnant, and wants to get married soon. Michael is hesitant as he’s not really convinced if he would be able to provide for them with his meagre salary. He soon comes around and they marry, privately for the time being, with Michael promising a grander wedding once they have the money.

The film then introduces us to Michael’s workplace. We meet his colleagues, the cashier – Raghavan, and the chef – Srinath. We also meet his boss, Shanmugam, who’s shown talking agitatedly about some mystery product over the phone. Shanmugam also piques Michael’s and his colleagues’ curiosity by inviting a dishevelled, homeless looking man into his office.

It turns out that Shanmugam has hired the man - a medium/exorcist of some sort – to rid his daughter of a spirit that he believes has possessed her. Michael becomes aware of this when he goes to Shanmugam’s home to drop something off, as requested. Once there, he witnesses the “possession”, as well as the medium attempting to talk to the spirit.

The film keeps moving at a brisk pace. Shortly, Michael gets a pizza delivery order, just as he’s about to leave, Shanmugam calls him inside his cabin and orders him to deliver something to his home on the way.

Michael leaves for the delivery. The next scene cuts to Shanmugam arriving back at the restaurant to find Michael bruised, bloodied and in a state of shock, sitting on the restaurant floor. His colleagues from the restaurant seem to be in a similar state as well.

On being prodded by Shanmugam, Michael breaks down and narrates the tale of what happened once he left for the delivery.

The delivery was to an affluent bungalow (the same bungalow mentioned earlier in the article). Once there, Michael witnesses two murders, a child’s un-dead spirit (the same one believed to be possessing Shanmugam’s daughter), and numerous other paranormal activities. This includes an unconnected landline telephone that suddenly comes to life and starts forwarding calls that were originally meant for Michael’s mobile.
 We also soon learn that the bungalow is actually a dilapidated old structure, with a reputation for being haunted. It was also the scene of numerous unexplained deaths. There is also a twist - Michael’s wife is also supposed to have died in the same premise a while back.

The parts mentioned above, and the opening sequences set the story moving along nicely. I started wondering whether I’d stumbled upon that elusive holy grail – an Indian horror film that would actually turn out to be intelligent and genuinely scary, because let’s face it, where horror is concerned, our films are infantile and cringeworthy.

I cycled through various theories ranging from whether the whole premise was a prank being played on Michael by his wife and colleagues (as he’s a faint hearted guy who scares easily), to whether he was hallucinating the whole thing - as a form of coping with the fact that his wife might have actually committed suicide a few scenes earlier, to time warps, and other fantastic guesses.

In the end, all the theories turned to damp squibs. It turns out that Michael and his wife had concocted this story as an elaborate scheme to dupe Shanmugam. What actually transpires is that when Michael leaves for the delivery that fateful night, he accidentally stumbles upon the “something” that Shanmugam had asked him to drop off at his house. That “something” is also the mystery product from the earlier scenes – priceless gems. Just what Michael and his wife need to make a new life for themselves and their baby. They hatch this grandiose scheme to fool Shanmugam, playing his own beliefs and superstitions against him, and thus procure the gems for themselves.

I personally felt that this film was a disappointment. It could have been so much more.

My main problem with it is the fact that the film would have worked a lot better if Karthik had actually shown Michael narrating the happenings in the bungalow and then gave us the big reveal, rather than showing what he experienced in a flashback-mode, with a lot of visual trickery, as if it were real. That would have made the film intellectually honest as well as make it a seamless whole (But I guess that wouldn’t have had quite the visceral impact the director wanted, and instead he settled for the easy way out).

I get that we, the audience, are listening to Michael tell the story, and we are as much in the dark and as taken in as Shanmugam. However the means of telling and employing a certain device to tell that story rings false to me. If Karthik had chosen to go the other way (of showing Michael narrating the story, instead of showing it via flashback), we would have had an extremely intelligent, “talky” thriller with horror elements, comparable with the best in the world. To me, the version he decided to go with feels like a cop-out and rings false.

I didn’t even mind the ending where paranormal incidents are suddenly introduced after it was established that there was actually nothing spooky going on. I do however mind uninspired trickery.

This film felt like I had ordered a plain margherita, and instead, got a pepperoni pizza.

I was left feeling disappointed with this film. However, I do have high hopes for Tamil (and maybe Indian horror) a few years down the road.  Although, there are large logic holes in our horror flicks, “Pizza” and “Maya” (released in 2015) show that filmmakers are focusing on atmospherics, pacing and a more mature way of presentation, rather than juvenile Ramsay Bros. type of crap that Indian horror was synonymous with in the past.

Friday 5 February 2016

The Biffes - A wrap-up





The 8th Annual Biffes wound up on the 4th of Feb. Scroll down for my top 5 picks from the festival.

This edition of the fest definitely went large. Barring a few technical glitches and irate audience members, it seemed to be a pretty smooth affair. Kudos to the organizers.

We'll miss watching the best that world cinema has to offer, and the fact that you could just enter a darkened room without prior knowledge of the movie being screened (which is how I like to operate, most of the times) and be whisked off to faraway exotic places, with actors mouthing lines in strange tongues and yet acknowledge our common humanity (that sounded clichéd as fuck).

In case you needed it, this festival definitely serves as a reminder to cut the cord, and explore film industries other than our own and Hollywood. And move away from the sanitised, polished, nonsensical mainstream.

As mentioned earlier, the venue was a nightmare to get to, however the films screened were all top-shelf (most of them at least). So without further ado, my top 5 films + shorts from the fest (a reminder: these are my personal picks from amongst the films and shorts that I watched).

The Films:



A tale of a Jewish woman - in post World War 2 Germany - seeking out her husband, who might have betrayed her to the Nazis. Haunting music, memorable scenes and an accurate reconstruction of what a post war city might look like, all make this the pick of the lot for me.

This is also a study of the Jews on one hand - with some of them wanting to go back to the way things were before the war and the concentration camps, and others wanting nothing to do with Germany or Germans, yet unable to let go of the past and move on – and the Germans on the other, with their widespread denial of the knowledge of the atrocities perpetrated on the Jews.


This more or less takes place within the confines of a Taxi (driven by the director, Jafar Panahi). He pretends to be a taxi driver in this docufiction, and secretly films his various passengers. It offers a fascinating insight on Iran and into the lives of its average citizens, and the oppressive regime that they live under.

To be honest, I hadn’t heard of Jafar before this film. I did some digging around, post my viewing, and it looks like real life is stranger than fiction. It turns out that he was arrested by the Iranian govt. In 2010 and sentenced to a six-year jail sentence and also prohibited from making films for 20 years. All his films since then have been made in extreme secrecy and taken out of Iran in a clandestine manner, as he’s prohibited from traveling, as well. This government interference into filmmaking is tackled in a humorous sequence in the film, when his niece talks to him about the various dos and don’ts of filmmaking, as instructed by her teacher.


A Finnish film, Absolution tackles themes of loss, guilt, conscience, revenge etc. It proves that a film can be entertaining without having to spoon-feed its audience with dull minutiae. The actors are excellent with their eyes and body language doing most of the talking, established through tight close-ups.



Reviewed earlier.


A Turkish coming-of-age film, it focuses on the lives of five sisters growing up in a conservative society. It reminded me of a lot of movies that Star used to play back in the day – the-coming-of-age of young females against a repressive, conservative society. It follows the same patterns, and you can see the story developing a mile away. One complaint is that time doesn’t seem to lapse logically, and spaces between events seem to be cut short just to fit a particular narrative. However, the leads were all very good, and seemed to live their parts, and the way the film has been shot is gorgeous. It makes me want to pack my bags and head to Turkey immediately.

The Shorts:

        To be precise, I should say “Short”. Out of the 3 shorts that I watched, “Leeches” is by far the best. I reviewed it in a previous post, and you can find it here.

Well, that’s about it for this edition of the Biffes. It's time to sail the friendly seas again, argh. Cheers until next time.